1. The Netherlands UBO Register: The State of Play in 2026

The Netherlands is home to approximately two million registered companies, making it one of Europe's largest corporate jurisdictions. For compliance teams, KYB platforms, and due diligence analysts working with Dutch counterparties, the UBO register is a critical data source — and right now, one of the most operationally complex to access in the EU.

The Dutch UBO register is maintained by the Kamer van Koophandel (KvK) — the Chamber of Commerce — as part of the Handelsregister (Trade Register). It was established under the Wet ter voorkoming van witwassen en financieren van terrorisme (Wwft), the Dutch Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act, transposing AMLD4 and AMLD5. Most entities were required to file by March 27, 2022.

Three events have dramatically reshaped the access landscape since 2022: the CJEU ruling that closed public access, the July 2025 Amendment Act that formally restricted the register to specific parties — but left those parties unable to access it directly — and the upcoming KvK UBO API due in Q2 2026, which will finally enable systematic programmatic access. Until then, the Netherlands sits in a uniquely dysfunctional position: a register with data but no functional access route for most legitimate users.

ℹ️
Part of the Global Ownership Data Index

This article is part of Zavia.ai's Global Ownership Data Index, covering UBO and corporate data availability across 173 countries. The Netherlands is covered in the EU & EEA section, scored as Restricted for UBO access.


2. What Is a UBO Under Dutch Law?

The Wwft defines a UBO as the natural person who ultimately owns or controls a Dutch legal entity. The definition follows the EU standard closely but includes specific Dutch interpretations that matter for cross-border compliance work.

The 25% threshold

A natural person qualifies as a UBO if they directly or indirectly hold more than 25% of shares, voting rights, or ownership interest in the entity. Indirect ownership is calculated through the entire holding chain: a person holding 60% of a company that itself holds 50% of a Dutch BV qualifies, because their indirect stake (30%) exceeds the threshold.

Control by other means

If no individual meets the 25% threshold through ownership or voting rights, the "control by other means" test applies. This covers individuals who have the authority to appoint or dismiss the majority of the organisation's management, or who exercise equivalent dominant influence over the entity's decisions.

The "pseudo-UBO" rule

When exhaustive analysis cannot identify any natural person through either ownership or control tests, Dutch law requires the designation of a pseudo-UBO. This consists of all natural persons who collectively comprise the statutory senior management — typically the board of directors or managing directors (hoger leidinggevend personeel). Unlike some EU jurisdictions, the Netherlands does not use the term "last resort UBO" — the pseudo-UBO designation is applied universally where no individual UBO can be identified.

ℹ️ Key Threshold Change Incoming

Under the EU Anti-Money Laundering Regulation (AMLR) applying from July 10, 2027, the threshold shifts from "more than 25%" to "25% or more." The Dutch Minister of Finance has already proposed this change at national level. Any person holding exactly 25% will qualify as a UBO. Companies with shareholders at exactly 25% will need to revise their UBO registrations.

Which entities must register?

Entity Type Must Register? Notes
Private limited companies (BV)✓ YesUnlisted only; listed BVs and their 100% subsidiaries are exempt
Public limited companies (NV)✓ YesUnlisted only
Foundations (Stichtingen)✓ YesIncluding foundations used as holding entities
Associations with full legal capacity✓ YesIncluding those with limited capacity but conducting business
General partnerships (VOF), limited partnerships (CV)✓ YesAll commercial partnerships except silent partnerships without business activity
Cooperatives and mutual insurance societies✓ Yes
European economic interest groupings (EEIG)✓ YesRegistered office in Netherlands per their statutes
Trusts and similar legal arrangements✓ YesSeparate UBO Register for Trusts (in force from November 2022)
Religious denominations● PendingRequired but implementation date not yet confirmed by KvK
Listed companies & their 100% subsidiaries✗ ExemptSubject to separate public disclosure requirements
Sole proprietorships (eenmanszaken)✗ Exempt
Foreign entities with only a Dutch branch✗ ExemptMust register UBOs in their country of origin

3. What UBO Data Is Actually Available in the Dutch Register

The KvK register holds two tiers of information: data visible to a limited public and data restricted to authorities and approved institutions. The split is important — what Wwft institutions can access differs meaningfully from what is available to third parties today.

Data FieldHeld in Register?Accessible?Notes
Full legal name✓ Yes● Wwft/authorities onlyNot publicly visible since Nov 2022
Month and year of birth✓ Yes● Wwft/authorities onlyFull date held but only month/year shared with institutions
Full date of birth (day included)✓ Yes● Authorities onlyNot disclosed to Wwft institutions
Nationality✓ Yes● Wwft/authorities only
Nature and size of interest (%)✓ Yes● Wwft/authorities onlyBanded ranges (25–50%, 50–75%, 75–100%)
Home address✓ Yes● Authorities onlyNot disclosed to Wwft institutions
Identity document copy✓ Yes● Authorities onlyUsed for verification against BSN; not shared beyond competent authorities
Citizen service number (BSN)✓ Yes● Authorities onlyChecked by KvK for verification; not disclosed externally
Ownership chain / corporate structure✗ No✗ NoRegister shows the declared UBO, not the holding path
Historical ownership changes✗ No✗ NoRequired under 6AMLD from July 2026
PEP / sanctions flags✗ No✗ NoMust be cross-referenced from external sources
⚠️
No Direct Access Even for Wwft Institutions — Until Q2 2026

The July 2025 Amendment Act formally grants Wwft and Wtt institutions access to the UBO register. But in practice, this access is not yet operational. Institutions cannot query the register directly and must rely entirely on clients requesting their own certified UBO extract from KvK and providing it manually. The KvK Dataservice UBO extract and UBO API are not expected until Q2 2026.


4. Who Can Access the Dutch UBO Register?

The Netherlands has gone through a turbulent three-phase access history since 2022. The current situation — where access is legally defined but practically unavailable for most authorised parties — is unique in the EU.

September 2020
Dutch UBO register launches. Part of the UBO information is publicly accessible under AMLD5 implementation.
March 27, 2022
Deadline for all existing entities to complete UBO registration with KvK. Compliance rate reached approximately 80% by March 2024.
November 2022
CJEU ruling (Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20) strikes down blanket public access to EU UBO registers. KvK immediately closes the register to the public. Filing obligation continues unchanged.
October 2024
New notary reporting requirement: civil law notaries must report any discrepancies between UBO register data and information collected during their due diligence to KvK.
June 1, 2024
Companies can obtain a certified extract of their own UBO data from KvK. Designed as a workaround — entities provide extracts to their banks or notaries pending formal API access.
July 15, 2025
Amendment Act on Restricting Access to UBO Registers enters into force. Amends Articles 22, 22a, and 28 of the Dutch Trade Register Act 2007. Wwft/Wtt institutions formally granted access — but in practice cannot yet use it due to missing KvK infrastructure.
Q2 2026
KvK Dataservice UBO extract and UBO API expected to launch. Wwft/Wtt institutions will access via eHerkenning, integrable directly into compliance systems.
July 2026
6AMLD transposition deadline. Presumed legitimate interest for journalists and civil society, historical data requirements, and machine-readable bulk access mandated.

Current access categories (as of March 2026)

CategoryLegal AccessPractical StatusMethod
Competent authorities (police, tax, FIU-NL, prosecution)Full — all fieldsOperationalDirect KvK access
Wwft/Wtt institutions (banks, notaries, insurers, accountants, lawyers)Limited UBO data● Client extracts onlyClient provides own KvK-certified extract; API from Q2 2026
Persons with legitimate interestTBD — pending lower legislationNot yet availableRules not yet published by Dutch government
Registered UBO (own data)Own data onlyOperationalVia My KvK / DigiD
General publicNoneClosed since Nov 2022No access route
⚠️
Legitimate Interest Rules Are Still Undefined

The Amendment Act provides for a legitimate interest access category — but the lower legislation defining who qualifies and how applications are assessed has not yet been published. KvK will be the decision-making body once rules are in force. Until then, journalists, civil society organisations, researchers, and businesses wanting to verify counterparties have no formal access route to Dutch UBO data.


5. Is Access Free? Cost and Availability Breakdown

Access MethodCostWhat You Get
KvK Handelsregister (basic company data)Free (basic) / paid extractsCompany name, KvK number, RSIN, registration date, legal form, address, directors — no UBO data
KvK certified UBO extract (own company)Free for the registrantFull UBO data for own entity — designed to be shared with Wwft institutions pending API
KvK Dataservice UBO API (via eHerkenning)Paid (pricing TBC)Programmatic UBO data access for Wwft/Wtt institutions — not yet live; expected Q2 2026
KvK Business Open Data Set (bulk)FreeLocation, registration date, activity, legal form, dissolution date — fully anonymised; no company names or KvK numbers
KvK Zoeken API (company search)Fixed monthly + per-queryEntity search, basic firmographic data — no UBO or shareholder data
Legitimate interest accessTBDNot yet available; rules unpublished

The current certified extract model — where companies must request their own extract and submit it manually to their bank or notary — creates significant operational friction. It is a stopgap measure, not a scalable compliance workflow. The Q2 2026 KvK API is expected to replace this entirely for Wwft institutions.


6. Penalties for Non-Compliance

Dutch UBO non-compliance is enforced by the Bureau Economische Handhaving (BEH), a branch of the Dutch Tax Administration (Belastingdienst). Unlike France, which added new enforcement powers in 2025, the Netherlands has maintained consistent penalties since the register's inception.

€21,750
Maximum administrative fine for failing to register or update UBO data
2 years
Maximum imprisonment in exceptional cases of deliberate non-compliance or fraud
7 days
Window to report any change in UBO data after it takes effect — no exceptions
⚠️
Compliance Risk for Wwft Institutions

Because financial institutions currently cannot verify UBO data directly, there is a material risk that the notary and bank reporting obligation — the duty to flag discrepancies to KvK — will be unintentionally neglected. The AFM (Netherlands Authority for Financial Markets) and DNB (Dutch Central Bank) have both flagged this gap. Institutions that fail to report discrepancies risk fines and criminal proceedings even where the non-compliance was unintentional.

The 7-day update window applies without exceptions. KvK has no legal power to grant deferrals — including for exceptional circumstances. Any change to a UBO's information — ownership percentage, address, new UBO arriving, existing UBO departing — must be reported within 7 days of the change becoming official.


7. Existing Legislation

LegislationYearKey Provision
EU 4th AML Directive (AMLD4)2015Required member states to establish UBO registers for companies
EU 5th AML Directive (AMLD5)2018Required public access to UBO registers; Netherlands implemented in 2020
Dutch UBO Register launch (Wwft implementation)Sept 2020Register goes live; part of UBO data publicly accessible
UBO Register Trusts Implementation ActNov 2022Separate register for trusts and similar legal arrangements; trustees must register UBOs
CJEU Ruling (Cases C-37/20 & C-601/20)Nov 2022Struck down blanket public access; KvK immediately closes register to public
Certified extract mechanism (KvK)Jun 2024Companies can obtain own UBO extract to provide to Wwft institutions as interim workaround
Notary reporting requirementOct 2024Civil law notaries must report UBO data discrepancies discovered during due diligence
Amendment Act on Restricting Access to UBO RegistersJul 2025Formally restricts access to Wwft/Wtt institutions and competent authorities; provides framework for legitimate interest category pending lower legislation
EU AML Package (6AMLD + AMLR)2024 adoptedHarmonised LIA rules, historical data, bulk/machine-readable access; deadline July 2026–2027

8. Upcoming Changes: The 2026–2027 Roadmap

1. KvK UBO API via eHerkenning (Q2 2026)

This is the most operationally significant change on the immediate horizon. KvK is building a structured Dataservice UBO extract and UBO API, accessible via eHerkenning — the Dutch government's business authentication system. Wwft and Wtt institutions will be able to integrate this directly into their KYC and CDD systems, replacing the current client-extract workaround entirely. Pricing has not yet been published. The API is expected in Q2 2026, though KvK has not confirmed a specific launch date beyond "second quarter."

⚠️
eHerkenning Barrier for Non-Dutch Entities

The KvK UBO API will be accessible via eHerkenning — the Dutch business authentication system available only to entities registered in the Netherlands. Non-Dutch compliance teams, foreign Wwft-equivalent institutions, and overseas KYB platforms will not be able to access the KvK UBO API directly without a Dutch legal presence or intermediary.

2. Legitimate interest access rules (2026)

The Amendment Act created the legal framework for legitimate interest access, but the lower legislation defining who qualifies and how KvK assesses applications has not yet been published. This is expected to be shaped by 6AMLD transposition. Until the rules are formalised, there is no application process for journalists, researchers, civil society organisations, or businesses wanting to verify counterparties.

3. Presumed legitimate interest for journalists and civil society (July 2026)

Under 6AMLD, journalists, academics, and civil society organisations with AML-related work will receive presumed legitimate interest — automatic register access without individual approval. The Netherlands must transpose this by July 2026. Given that the legitimate interest rules are not yet published even for the standard category, 6AMLD compliance will require significant legislative movement in the next four months.

4. Historical ownership data (July 2026)

6AMLD requires all EU member states to provide legitimate-interest users with access to historical UBO records — showing when individuals became or ceased to be beneficial owners. The current Dutch register provides no historical data. This is a material gap for retrospective due diligence and financial crime investigations.

5. Threshold change: "more than 25%" to "25% or more" (July 2027)

The AMLR shifts the ownership threshold slightly. The Dutch Minister of Finance has already proposed this change at national level. Any person holding exactly 25% of shares, voting rights, or ownership interest will qualify as a UBO from July 10, 2027. Companies with shareholders at exactly 25% will need to revise their UBO registrations when the new rules take effect.

Direction of Travel: More Access, More Automation

The 2026–2027 roadmap moves clearly toward more functional access. The KvK API in Q2 2026 resolves the most urgent operational gap for Dutch Wwft institutions. The 6AMLD changes will extend access to legitimate interest users and mandate historical data. Compliance teams should plan now for an API-driven workflow rather than the current client-extract model.


9. The Real Challenges of Accessing Dutch UBO Data

9.1 No functional access for Wwft institutions (until Q2 2026)

The most significant operational gap in the EU right now. Banks, notaries, insurers, accountants, and lawyers — all of whom are legally required to verify their clients' UBO data — cannot access the KvK UBO register directly. They depend entirely on clients requesting and submitting their own certified extracts. This creates friction, delays, and a material compliance risk, particularly for complex holding structures or uncooperative clients.

9.2 No legitimate interest access route (rules unpublished)

Unlike France, which has a functioning (if slow) legitimate interest application process, the Netherlands has not yet published the lower legislation defining who qualifies for legitimate interest access or how to apply. As of March 2026, there is no application process. Journalists, researchers, civil society, and businesses wanting to verify counterparties have no formal route to Dutch UBO data.

9.3 eHerkenning barrier locks out non-Dutch entities

Even once the KvK UBO API launches in Q2 2026, it will require eHerkenning authentication — a government identity system available only to Netherlands-registered entities. Foreign compliance teams, overseas Wwft-equivalent institutions, and non-Dutch KYB platforms will not be able to access it directly. The practical workaround will be via a licensed Dutch data provider or intermediary.

9.4 No ownership chain resolution

The Dutch UBO register records the declared UBO — the natural person at the end of the ownership chain. It does not map the intermediate corporate structure. A Dutch BV owned by a Luxembourg SARL owned by a Cayman Islands company: the register tells you who the declared UBO is; it does not show how control flows from the Cayman entity through Luxembourg to the Netherlands. Resolving the full chain requires combining Dutch data with corporate records from each intermediate jurisdiction.

9.5 KvK shareholder data is not structured

The Handelsregister does not provide structured, machine-readable shareholder data. Company filings only list the main shareholder, and the relationship between shareholding data and UBO data is not automatically resolved. For cross-border UBO verification workflows, this means Dutch KYB typically requires combining registry data with UBO register data from two separate sources — neither of which is easily accessible at scale.

9.6 No historical data

The current Dutch UBO register provides no historical ownership records. There is no way to determine who was the UBO six months ago, what ownership percentage they held before a restructuring, or when a particular individual was added to or removed from the register. This gap is significant for retrospective due diligence, litigation support, and financial crime investigations. It will not be addressed until 6AMLD transposition in mid-2026 at the earliest.

9.7 Compliance rate gaps

As of March 2024, approximately 80% of companies had completed UBO registration — meaning roughly 20% of Dutch entities have either incomplete or missing UBO data. The BEH is responsible for enforcement, but the combination of self-reporting and limited verification capacity means a meaningful portion of the register reflects what was filed rather than the current ownership reality.


10. How Zavia.ai Resolves Dutch UBO Access

Zavia.ai connects directly to KvK and the Netherlands' official company data infrastructure — providing structured, API-accessible UBO and corporate data for Dutch entities without requiring your team to navigate the eHerkenning registration process, manage client-extract workflows, or build and maintain a separate KvK integration.

🇳🇱 Netherlands UBO Data via the Zavia.ai API

One API endpoint. Real-time access to Dutch beneficial ownership, directors, shareholders, and company registry data — sourced directly from KvK and the Handelsregister. No eHerkenning account required.

  • Real-time UBO queries for any Dutch KvK number
  • Cross-border ownership chain resolution
  • Corporate linkage — subsidiaries, parents, group structure
  • Bulk data delivery — licensed file exports at scale
  • Sanctions overlay and KYB verification workflow
  • Historical company data and director history
  • 173-country coverage — one integration, global reach
  • Full reseller and redistribution rights available
Access Netherlands UBO Data via API →

Resolving the eHerkenning barrier

The KvK UBO API launching in Q2 2026 will require eHerkenning — a Dutch government authentication system unavailable to foreign entities. For non-Dutch compliance teams, overseas financial institutions, and global KYB platforms, this means the new API will not be directly accessible. Zavia.ai holds direct access and can deliver structured Dutch UBO data through a single international API endpoint, without any requirement for Dutch entity registration or eHerkenning credentials.

Cross-border ownership chain resolution

The Dutch UBO register tells you who the declared UBO is. It does not show you how they control the entity. For a Dutch BV owned through a Luxembourg SARL and a Cayman Islands holding company, Zavia.ai resolves the full ownership chain across all three jurisdictions — connecting Dutch KvK data with 173 countries of government-sourced corporate and ownership data in a single structured API response.

Bulk data delivery for compliance platforms

For compliance platforms, financial institutions, and data products that need Dutch UBO data at scale, Zavia.ai offers structured bulk data file delivery. Licensed extracts updated on a defined cadence, delivered in your preferred format. Full reseller rights available for redistribution use cases.

🔍
Indirect ownership is where most risk hides

A Dutch BV whose declared UBO holds exactly 26% through two holding entities in different jurisdictions may appear compliant in the KvK register. Zavia.ai traces the full chain above and below the Dutch entity — surfacing indirect controllers, circular ownership structures, and cross-border linkages that the KvK register alone cannot show.

See how Zavia traces indirect ownership →


11. Frequently Asked Questions

The Dutch UBO register is a central database of ultimate beneficial owners of Dutch companies and legal entities. It is maintained by the Kamer van Koophandel (KvK) — the Dutch Chamber of Commerce — as part of the Handelsregister (Trade Register). It was established under the Wwft (Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act) to implement the EU's AMLD4 and AMLD5 directives. Most entities were required to complete initial registration by March 27, 2022.
No — the Dutch UBO register has been closed to the general public since November 2022, following the CJEU ruling (Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20) that found blanket public access to UBO registers violated the right to privacy under the EU Charter. The July 2025 Amendment Act formally codified this, restricting access to competent authorities and Wwft/Wtt institutions. In practice, even authorised institutions cannot access the register directly until the KvK Dataservice UBO API launches in Q2 2026.
Under the July 2025 Amendment Act, access is limited to: (1) competent authorities — police, tax authority, FIU-NL, public prosecution — who have full direct access; (2) Wwft and Wtt institutions — banks, notaries, insurers, accountants, lawyers — who are formally granted access but in practice must rely on client-provided certified extracts until the KvK API launches in Q2 2026; (3) registered UBOs who can view their own data via My KvK. A legitimate interest category is provided for in the legislation, but the rules defining who qualifies have not yet been published.
A natural person qualifies as a UBO in the Netherlands if they directly or indirectly hold more than 25% of shares, voting rights, or ownership interest — or exercise equivalent control through other means, such as the authority to appoint or dismiss the majority of management. If no individual meets these criteria, a "pseudo-UBO" — typically the statutory senior management — must be registered. From July 2027, the AMLR shifts the threshold to "25% or more," meaning persons holding exactly 25% will also qualify.
KvK has confirmed that the Dataservice UBO extract and UBO API will be available from the second quarter of 2026. Access will be via eHerkenning, the Dutch government business authentication system. Wwft and Wtt institutions will be able to integrate this directly into their KYC and CDD systems. No specific launch date within Q2 has been published. The API will not be directly accessible to non-Dutch entities without eHerkenning credentials — a barrier for international compliance teams and overseas KYB platforms.
Non-compliance with UBO registration obligations can result in administrative fines of up to €21,750, criminal sanctions including up to two years' imprisonment in exceptional cases, restrictions on establishing new business relationships with AML-regulated institutions, and reputational damage. Any change in UBO data must be reported to KvK within seven days of the change becoming official — KvK has no power to grant deferrals under any circumstances. Enforcement is handled by the Bureau Economische Handhaving (BEH), a branch of the Dutch Tax Administration.
Not through KvK directly. The KvK UBO API launching in Q2 2026 will require eHerkenning — available only to Netherlands-registered entities. There is no legitimate interest access route currently available (rules unpublished). Non-Dutch entities can ask their Dutch counterparties to self-order a certified UBO extract from KvK and share it — but this is manual, slow, and not scalable. For systematic access to Dutch UBO data at scale, the practical route is a licensed data provider such as Zavia.ai, which holds direct access and delivers data via an internationally accessible API.
A pseudo-UBO is a fallback designation used when no natural person can be identified as the UBO through ownership or control criteria. In this case, all natural persons who collectively comprise the statutory senior management — typically managing directors or board members — must be registered as pseudo-UBOs. This is equivalent to what France calls "UBOs of last resort" and Germany terms "fictitious UBOs." For foundations and associations where shareholding is absent, the entire statutory board is typically designated as pseudo-UBOs.
No — this is a key limitation. The KvK register records the declared UBO: the natural person at the end of the ownership chain. If the Dutch BV is owned by a Luxembourg holding company, the register does not trace the structure above that holding entity. It captures the outcome of the ownership analysis (the individual UBO) but not the intermediate corporate pathway. For full ownership chain mapping — particularly critical for Dutch entities embedded in international group structures — you need to combine KvK data with corporate records from relevant foreign registries. Zavia.ai resolves this automatically across 173 countries.
The EU Sixth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (6AMLD), which the Netherlands must transpose by July 2026, will bring three key changes: (1) Journalists, researchers, and civil society with AML-related work will receive presumed legitimate interest — automatic register access without case-by-case approval. (2) Historical UBO data will become available to legitimate-interest users, showing when individuals became or ceased to be beneficial owners. (3) Machine-readable data formats and API access for authorised users will be mandated. From July 2027, the AMLR also shifts the ownership threshold from "more than 25%" to "25% or more."