RUDAR Anlagenmontage GmbH

Ownership is documented by the Liste der Gesellschafter (Komplettliste) held in the company’s register folder at Amtsgericht Neuruppin. It was certified by a notary in Angermünde in June 2025 and taken into the register folder in July 2025. It is a complete list drawn up after the 2025 merger was entered in the register, it accounts for the whole of the EUR 42,184.00 share capital, and it states each holder’s aggregate participation on its face. For a GmbH this list, not a share register, is the authoritative record of ownership.

All three holders are natural persons; no shareholder is a company. The register records the residence of Goran Magerl and of Christiane Magerl as Schwedt/Oder and that of Dr. Mirko Lüttke as Wandlitz. Two of the ten holdings — one of Goran Magerl’s and one of Dr. Mirko Lüttke’s — are marked on the list as arising from the 2023 merger.

Ultimate beneficial ownership

Goran Magerl is the ultimate beneficial owner. He holds 60.42% of the share capital directly, comfortably above the 25% threshold in § 3(2) of the German Geldwäschegesetz, and the articles of association currently on file allocate votes in proportion to the nominal amount of each Geschäftsanteil, so his voting position matches his capital position. Because no shareholder is a legal entity, the ownership is direct: there is no chain to trace and no intermediate vehicle. He is also one of the two managing directors, each of whom may represent the company alone.

Christiane Magerl at 23.14% and Dr. Mirko Lüttke at 16.44% are each below the threshold and are therefore not beneficial owners on the strength of their shareholdings alone. The register records Christiane Isolde Edith Magerl’s birth name as Lüttke, the same surname as the third shareholder; no filing we retrieved states any relationship between any of the three, and we infer none. Whether any of them act in concert is not something the filings answer, and a reader who needs that answered will have to ask the company.

On the Transparenzregister: as a legal person under private law the company is obliged by § 20(1) GwG to report its beneficial owners to that register. We could not confirm whether an entry exists, because the Transparenzregister is not open to the public. Under § 23(1) GwG inspection is available only to authorities and courts, to obliged entities that show they need it for customer due diligence, and to anyone who can demonstrate a legitimate interest — the position since the German legislature narrowed access following the Court of Justice judgment of November 2022 in Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20, which struck down general public access. Someone inspecting on the strength of a legitimate interest is shown the beneficial owner’s name, the nature and extent of the economic interest, the month and year of birth, the country of residence and the nationalities — not the full cap table. The statement above therefore rests on the Handelsregister, which anyone can query, rather than on the Transparenzregister.

Data availability

The provider shareholder field on this record is materially incomplete and should not be relied on. It carries five of the ten Geschäftsanteile, covering EUR 13,330 of nominal capital, or 31.59%, and leaves 68.41% unrecorded. The five rows it does carry are individually accurate: each matches a real Geschäftsanteil on the Gesellschafterliste, at the right nominal amount and the right percentage.

The omission is not neutral in its effect. The missing holdings include all three of Goran Magerl’s largest ones and both of Dr. Mirko Lüttke’s larger ones. In the stored data the majority owner and sole beneficial owner appears as a 7.19% minority holder, and the company appears to have no holder above 25% at all — that is, to have no identifiable beneficial owner by shareholding. Screening built on the provider field alone would reach the opposite conclusion from the register.

The three rows naming Christiane Magerl are not a duplication defect. The Gesellschafterliste shows she holds three separate Geschäftsanteile of EUR 4,300, EUR 500 and EUR 4,962, and those are precisely the three rows stored, with the percentages that go with them. The quantity of 1 on every row means one Geschäftsanteil, not one share of stock; a GmbH holding is a divisible nominal amount rather than a share count, so the quantity field carries no information about size here.

One stored name is corrupted: the surname of the third shareholder is held with a Unicode escape sequence written out literally rather than decoded, so the stored text is not the name. The name is Lüttke, and the register gives him the title Dr., which the stored data does not carry.

The register shows two managing directors and one Prokurist. All three are also shareholders.

Goran Magerl — Geschäftsführer (managing director); residence recorded as Schwedt/Oder. The register grants him power to represent the company alone and releases him from the restrictions of § 181 BGB, so he may contract with the company on his own behalf or as representative of a third party. He is the majority shareholder with 60.42% and the company’s beneficial owner, and he is the only managing director named in the company’s own Impressum.

Christiane Isolde Edith Magerl — Geschäftsführerin (managing director); residence recorded as Schwedt/Oder. Her powers are the same: sole representation and release from § 181 BGB. She holds 23.14% of the capital. Neither the stored record nor the extract we retrieved gives a date for her appointment.

Dr. Mirko Lüttke — Prokurist; residence recorded as Wandlitz. He holds Einzelprokura, that is sole procuration, expressly limited to the company’s branch at Schwedt/Oder OT Zützen. He holds 16.44% of the capital.

Representation rule

This is the single most operationally useful fact on the page, and it is not in the provider data at all. The general Vertretungsregelung on the register reads: the company has one or more managing directors; if only one is appointed, he represents the company alone; if several are appointed, the company is represented jointly by two managing directors or by one managing director together with a Prokurist; sole representation power may be granted. Two managing directors are currently appointed, so the default would be joint signature.

But the register also records a specific grant to each of them individually: each has the power to represent the company alone, and each is released from § 181 BGB. The effect is that either Goran Magerl or Christiane Isolde Edith Magerl can bind the company on a single signature, and a counterparty is not entitled to insist on two. The articles filed in June 2025 contain the same general rule and expressly allow the shareholders’ meeting to grant sole representation without amending the articles, which is the mechanism by which these grants were made.

A Prokurist is a different thing from a managing director. Dr. Mirko Lüttke’s authority derives from the commercial rules of the HGB rather than from the GmbHG, it is not organ representation, and here it is restricted on the face of the register to one branch. He cannot represent the company generally, and he is not a director for KYB purposes.

Data availability

The provider officer field records Dr. Mirko Lüttke’s title only as “Officer”. That is a material understatement of what the register says and, if read as a directorship, an overstatement of his authority: the register shows a Prokurist with sole procuration limited to a single branch. The field also carries no representation rule, no § 181 BGB exemption, no branch restriction, and no appointment date for two of the three people, and it renders the surname Lüttke with an undecoded escape sequence. The appointment date it stores for Goran Magerl, in November 2005, coincides with the founding date recorded on the register; the extract we retrieved does not separately date either managing director’s appointment.

The provider field also stores fragments of a date of birth for one of the managing directors. Zavia does not publish dates of birth for private individuals, and none appears on this page.

There is no group, and that is a positive finding rather than missing data. The entire share capital of RUDAR Anlagenmontage GmbH is held by three natural persons; no shareholder is a legal entity; and the register records no parent, no controlling enterprise and no domination or profit-transfer agreement. The company sits at the top of its own structure and has no subsidiaries on the register. For a KYB reader this is the simplest ownership shape there is: one German company, three individual owners, one of whom holds a clear majority.

The company does have one registered branch: trauthūs Zweigniederlassung der RUDAR Anlagenmontage GmbH, seated at Schwedt/Oder OT Zützen and shown on the register as current. A Zweigniederlassung is not a separate legal person: a contract concluded under that name is a contract with RUDAR Anlagenmontage GmbH, and the company’s whole estate stands behind it. Dr. Mirko Lüttke’s procuration is restricted to this branch. The branch name sits alongside the real estate and consultancy activities that were added to the registered object of the company.

What growth there has been came from absorbing other companies rather than from acquiring subsidiaries. The current register entry records two mergers by absorption, in each of which the transferring company was dissolved without liquidation and its assets passed to RUDAR Anlagenmontage GmbH as a whole:

• RUDAR Dienstleistungs GmbH – RU.DIS, Amtsgericht Neuruppin HRB 10199, under a merger agreement and approving resolutions of July 2023.
• RIS Raffinerie Instandhaltung Schwedt GmbH, seated in Berlin, Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 169046 B, under a merger agreement and approving resolutions of May 2025.

Both have ceased to exist as legal persons. A counterparty holding a contract, a warranty or an unpaid invoice in either name should read it as running against RUDAR Anlagenmontage GmbH. The register’s document folder for this company also holds documents taken over from Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 169046 B and from Amtsgericht Neuruppin HRB 10324 NP, which is consistent with file transfers on absorption.

Data availability

The provider group field holds a single node representing the company itself, keyed on the string “DE HRB 10014 NP Neuruppin”. That is a register entry expressed as free text, not a stable identifier, and it will not join to anything; the register does publish a stable identifier for this company, the EUID DEG1309.HRB10014NP, which the field does not use. The node records no relationship of any kind. The conclusion it implies for this company — no parent, no subsidiary — happens to be correct, but it is reached by carrying nothing rather than by establishing anything, and the same empty node would appear for a company whose parent had simply not been collected. It also omits the registered branch and both absorbed predecessors.